Saudisation and Workforce Restructuring: Legal Do’s and Don’ts for Employers

Saudisation, also known as the Saudi nationalisation programme, is a central component of the Kingdom’s economic and social policy. It requires private sector organisations to increase the representation of Saudi nationals within their workforces. At the same time, many employers must also manage workforce restructuring as business models evolve. The interaction between Saudisation requirements and restructuring exercises presents both opportunities and risks. Employers must understand their legal duties, avoid common pitfalls, and implement strategies that are compliant with Saudi labour law.

 

Saudisation and the Nitaqat System

The Saudisation programme is administered under the Nitaqat system, which categorises companies into tiers ranging from Platinum and High Green to Yellow and Red. The categorisation depends on the number of Saudi nationals employed in relation to the overall workforce size. Companies in higher categories enjoy significant benefits such as faster access to work visas and eligibility for government contracts. By contrast, companies in lower categories may face severe restrictions that hinder their ability to operate effectively.

Recent policy adjustments have increased Saudisation requirements in specific industries, with some sectors now requiring up to 80 per cent Saudi employment. Employers must therefore ensure that their hiring strategies are aligned with these enhanced quotas and must also take advantage of support initiatives such as the Human Resources Development Fund, which provides subsidies for the recruitment and training of Saudi employees. Attempts at superficial compliance, such as appointing Saudi nationals to nominal positions without genuine responsibilities, are prohibited and can attract penalties.

Workforce Restructuring and Termination Procedures

Workforce restructuring often requires difficult decisions, including contract terminations or non-renewals. Saudi labour law provides clear rules under Articles 74 to 76 that govern notice requirements. For fixed-term contracts, Article 74 requires prior written notice of at least 30 to 60 days if either party does not intend to renew the contract. Article 75 requires that indefinite contracts be terminated with at least 60 days’ notice where employees are paid monthly, or 30 days in other cases. Article 76 makes it clear that failure to comply with notice obligations requires compensation equivalent to the wages for the notice period.

Employers must ensure that contracts clearly outline notice obligations and that any termination or non-renewal is adequately documented. Notices should always be in writing and acknowledged by both parties. Ambiguous or verbal notices expose employers to legal and financial risk.

Compensation under Article 77

Article 77 of the Labour Law governs compensation for termination without valid cause. Under this provision, indefinite contracts are subject to compensation of 15 days’ wages for each year of service, while fixed-term contracts require compensation equal to the salary for the remaining contract period. In both cases, compensation cannot be less than two months’ wages. Liquidated damages clauses may be included in employment contracts, but must comply with Shari’ah principles, which prohibit excessive penalties and require that compensation reflect actual loss. Importantly, reinstatement of employment is no longer a remedy available to employees following termination, as this option was removed in recent legislative reforms. Employers must therefore be able to demonstrate valid reasons for any termination, and they should consider offering fair severance packages beyond statutory requirements to minimise disputes and preserve goodwill.

Payroll and Wage Protection

Restructuring also requires close attention to payroll compliance. The Wage Protection System, managed by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development through the Mudad platform, ensures that wages are paid in full and on time. Delays or unlawful deductions trigger automatic alerts and may lead to investigations or suspension of company services. Employers are legally obliged to pay final entitlements promptly, with a deadline of one week for terminations initiated by the employer and two weeks where the employee has resigned. Employers are also prohibited from deducting costs such as residence permit fees or health insurance contributions from employees, as these remain the responsibility of the employer.

Labour Reforms under Vision 2030

The Kingdom’s Vision 2030 reforms have introduced several significant changes that employers must incorporate into their workforce strategies. Labour mobility rules now allow expatriates greater flexibility in moving between employers and in obtaining exit permits through platforms such as Qiwa and Absher. Probationary periods have been extended to a maximum of 180 days, allowing employers more time to evaluate employees before confirming permanent roles. Resignation procedures for fixed-term contracts have been formalised, with timeframes for employer responses and procedures for withdrawal of resignations managed through the Qiwa platform.

Additional reforms have also expanded employee rights, including extended bereavement, maternity and paternity leave, and enhanced anti-discrimination protections. Overtime provisions now allow employees to opt for compensatory time off in lieu of payment. Employers must update their policies to reflect these reforms to remain compliant and to foster a fair and transparent workplace culture.

The interaction between Saudisation policies and workforce restructuring presents both compliance challenges and strategic opportunities for employers in Saudi Arabia. By aligning recruitment strategies with Nitaqat requirements, respecting notice and termination obligations, compensating relatively under Article 77, ensuring payroll compliance, and adapting to ongoing labour reforms, employers can minimise legal risks and support the Kingdom’s broader economic and social objectives. Careful planning and strict adherence to the law will not only reduce the risk of disputes but also strengthen an organisation’s reputation in an increasingly competitive market.

Structuring Cross-Border M&A: Saudi Legal Considerations for International Investors

Saudi Arabia has emerged as one of the most dynamic markets in the Middle East, propelled by sweeping economic reforms under Vision 2030. Foreign direct investment (FDI) is a cornerstone of this transformation, with mergers and acquisitions (M&A) playing an increasingly important role in advancing corporate consolidation, capital deployment, and access to the Kingdom’s rapidly expanding sectors. For international investors, structuring a cross-border M&A transaction in Saudi Arabia requires careful navigation of the country’s regulatory, commercial, and cultural landscape.

 

Regulatory Framework and Approval Requirements

A combination of statutory laws and sector-specific regulations regulates cross-border M&A activity in Saudi Arabia. The Ministry of Investment of Saudi Arabia (MISA) is the primary authority for foreign investment licensing, while the Saudi Arabian General Authority for Competition (GAC) oversees competition clearances. Depending on the target company’s industry, approvals may also be required from sector regulators, such as the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) or the Communications, Space & Technology Commission (CST).

Foreign investors must obtain a foreign investment licence from MISA before acquiring shares in a Saudi entity. This process involves assessing eligibility under the foreign investment rules, which restrict ownership in specific sectors while providing incentives in others. In parallel, transactions that result in an economic concentration require notification to the GAC, particularly if financial thresholds based on turnover are met. Early engagement with regulators can prevent delays and ensure smooth completion.

Due Diligence and Compliance

Comprehensive due diligence is fundamental to any cross-border M&A, but in Saudi Arabia, it takes on heightened importance given the evolving regulatory environment. Investors should assess corporate governance structures, compliance with licensing and regulatory requirements, employee obligations, tax exposures, and contractual commitments.

Particular attention should be paid to foreign ownership restrictions and the validity of existing licences. In some cases, local sponsors or partners may have contractual rights that impact the deal structure. Moreover, compliance with anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws is strictly enforced, with Saudi Arabia aligning itself more closely with international standards in recent years.

Structuring Considerations

The choice of structure depends on the nature of the transaction, whether it is an asset purchase, share purchase, or merger. Share acquisitions are the most common route, offering continuity of contracts and licences, though they require regulatory consents. Asset acquisitions, while providing greater flexibility in isolating liabilities, can be more complex due to transfer formalities and additional approvals.

In some cases, international investors prefer to establish a Saudi holding or special purpose vehicle to facilitate the acquisition. This approach can simplify regulatory filings, allow for greater flexibility in financing arrangements, and provide tax efficiencies depending on the transaction’s cross-border elements.

Tax and Financial Implications

Tax structuring is another critical consideration. Saudi Arabia imposes a corporate income tax of 20% on foreign-owned entities, while Saudi and GCC shareholders are subject to zakat. Withholding tax applies to cross-border payments such as dividends, interest, and royalties, with rates varying depending on applicable double tax treaties.

The introduction of transfer pricing rules and increased scrutiny by the Zakat, Tax and Customs Authority (ZATCA) mean that related-party transactions must be carefully managed. Investors should also account for value-added tax (VAT) implications on asset transfers and service agreements linked to the acquisition.

Employment and Workforce Matters

Saudi labour law is protective of employees and mandates certain obligations on employers, including end-of-service benefits and Saudisation requirements. Any cross-border M&A transaction must evaluate the impact of workforce restructuring, continuity of employment, and compliance with mandatory localisation quotas. Employee-related liabilities should be factored into valuations and addressed in transaction documents to mitigate post-closing risks.

Dispute Resolution and Governing Law

While Saudi law will generally govern local entities and transactions, parties often seek to negotiate arbitration clauses for cross-border M&A. Saudi Arabia is a signatory to the New York Convention, and arbitration awards are enforceable through local courts, subject to compliance with Sharia principles. The Saudi Centre for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) provides a modern institutional framework for dispute resolution, offering international investors greater predictability.

Cultural and Commercial Dynamics

Beyond legal considerations, cultural alignment is central to successful deal execution in Saudi Arabia. Relationship-building, negotiation styles, and local business practices can significantly influence transaction timelines and outcomes. International investors benefit from engaging with experienced local advisers who understand both regulatory nuances and the importance of cultural context.

Cross-border M&A in Saudi Arabia presents significant opportunities, driven by government reforms, growing capital markets, and a youthful consumer base. However, international investors must navigate a multi-layered legal framework, regulatory approvals, and commercial sensitivities to achieve successful outcomes. With careful structuring, rigorous due diligence, and proactive engagement with regulators, cross-border transactions can unlock long-term strategic value in one of the region’s most attractive markets.

Protecting Athlete Image Rights Under Saudi Law: Challenges and Opportunities

Saudi Arabia’s rapid transformation has placed sports at the heart of its global positioning. With significant investments in football, motorsport, boxing, and e-sports, athletes are increasingly in the spotlight as both competitors and brand ambassadors. This surge in visibility has amplified the importance of protecting and monetising athlete image rights.

While Saudi Arabia does not yet recognise a standalone “right of publicity,” athletes benefit from protection through a patchwork of legal frameworks. These range from copyright and data protection laws to advertising regulations and contract principles. Understanding this framework is critical for athletes, clubs, and sponsors seeking to safeguard value and navigate compliance in one of the world’s fastest-growing sports markets.

Legal and Regulatory Framework for Athlete Image Rights

Copyright Law and Consent
Saudi Copyright Law prohibits the publication or commercial use of a person’s photograph or likeness without their consent, subject to limited exceptions. This provides athletes with a foundational legal tool to control unauthorised use of their image in campaigns, merchandise, or media.

Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL)
The PDPL, implemented in 2021 and updated in 2023, classifies an individual’s image and biometric features as personal data. Organisations must obtain explicit consent to collect, process, or share this data, and are subject to restrictions on cross-border transfers and data retention. For athletes, this ensures additional control over the commercial use of their likeness in digital and broadcast media.

Anti-Cyber Crime Law
The Anti-Cyber Crime Law criminalises acts that invade privacy, including unauthorised use or distribution of personal images via electronic means. This provides athletes with recourse against online misuse of their images, such as “deepfakes” or unlicensed digital endorsements.

Trademark Protection
Names, signatures, and even player numbers may be registered as trademarks with the Saudi Authority for Intellectual Property (SAIP). This enables athletes to secure exclusive rights to their commercial identity, strengthen enforcement against counterfeiting, and create structured licensing programmes.

Advertising and Media Regulations
Saudi advertising regulations prohibit misleading promotions and require transparency in sponsored content. Influencers and athletes endorsing products on social media must obtain a media licence and disclose paid partnerships. Breaches may result in fines or licence suspension, underscoring the importance of compliance in brand collaborations.

Civil Transactions Law (2023)
The recently enacted Civil Transactions Law codifies principles of contract and tort liability. It provides a framework for damages claims where unauthorised use of an athlete’s image causes material or moral harm. This enhances legal certainty in disputes relating to image rights breaches.

Monetisation of Athlete Image Rights

Endorsements and Sponsorships
Athletes in Saudi Arabia are increasingly signing endorsement deals spanning apparel, technology, financial services, and lifestyle products. Agreements typically cover the scope of use, territorial rights, exclusivity, approval processes, and morality clauses.

Licensing and Merchandising
Image rights can be licensed for merchandise such as jerseys, collectables, and digital content. Trademark registration strengthens protection and enforcement, while well-drafted licensing contracts ensure revenue sharing and quality control.

Collective Rights in Team Sports
Clubs and federations often control collective image rights for team campaigns and league promotions, while athletes retain personal rights. Careful contract drafting is required to prevent conflicts between personal endorsements and league sponsors.

Digital and Social Media Content
With the rise of influencer marketing, athletes increasingly monetise personal platforms. Compliance with PDPL, advertising disclosure rules, and influencer licensing is essential to avoid regulatory breaches.

Tax Considerations
  • Withholding Tax (WHT): Payments for licensing or endorsement fees to non-resident athletes are often treated as royalties and may be subject to 15% WHT, subject to treaty relief.
  • Value-Added Tax (VAT): Image rights services supplied in Saudi Arabia are generally subject to 15% VAT. For non-resident athletes, Saudi entities may need to account for VAT under the reverse charge mechanism.
  • Zakat/Income Tax: Saudi or GCC nationals may fall under zakat rules, while foreign athletes and entities remain subject to corporate income tax.

Tax structuring is therefore critical in cross-border endorsement and licensing arrangements.

Key Legal Risks
  • Unauthorised Exploitation: Online misuse or counterfeit merchandise can dilute brand value.
  • Ambush Marketing: Unauthorised association with major sporting events may infringe advertising rules and trademark rights.
  • Reputation Management: Breach of morality clauses or reputational disputes can trigger contract termination.
  • Compliance Failures: Lack of influencer licensing or PDPL consent may result in regulatory penalties.
  • Cross-Border Complexities: Multinational campaigns must reconcile Saudi rules with foreign IP, tax, and data regimes.
Dispute Resolution and Enforcement

Disputes may arise over endorsement contracts, misuse of images, or trademark infringement. Saudi courts and the Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) provide avenues for enforcement. As a signatory to the New York Convention, Saudi Arabia also enforces foreign arbitral awards, subject to Sharia principles. Regulatory authorities such as SAIP, SDAIA, and the Ministry of Commerce play active roles in policing infringements.

Strategic Opportunities

The legal framework—though fragmented—offers clear pathways for athletes and brands to protect and commercialise image rights. Key opportunities include:

  • Brand Building: Registering trademarks and reserving digital domains to strengthen brand portfolios.
  • Digital Innovation: Leveraging compliant social media and e-commerce channels for monetisation.
  • Structured Contracts: Aligning endorsement and licensing agreements with PDPL, advertising, and tax rules.
  • Event Leverage: Harnessing the Kingdom’s investment in mega-sporting events to expand regional and global brand reach.

Saudi Arabia’s evolving sports ecosystem offers unprecedented opportunities for athletes to monetise their image rights. While the Kingdom lacks a unified “publicity right,” a combination of copyright, data protection, advertising, and contract laws provides robust protection when used strategically. By anticipating compliance requirements and structuring deals carefully, athletes, clubs, and brands can unlock long-term value while safeguarding reputation and legal integrity.

From Term Sheet to Exit: Legal Risks in Saudi Private Equity Deals

Private equity (PE) has become a vital driver of investment activity in Saudi Arabia, fuelled by the Kingdom’s ambitious Vision 2030 agenda, diversification initiatives, and growing appetite for alternative asset classes. With sectors such as healthcare, technology, education, logistics, and energy transition attracting increasing investor attention, private equity transactions are gaining both scale and sophistication. Yet, while opportunities are abundant, private equity deals in Saudi Arabia carry unique legal risks at every stage of the investment cycle from negotiating the initial term sheet through to structuring the exit.

 

The Term Sheet

The term sheet is often the first formal step in a private equity deal, outlining key commercial and legal principles before binding agreements are executed. Although commonly perceived as non-binding, specific provisions such as exclusivity, confidentiality, and governing law typically carry legal force.

In Saudi Arabia, the drafting of term sheets requires careful attention to regulatory limitations on foreign ownership, mandatory licensing requirements, and competition considerations. Ambiguity or over-reliance on boilerplate language may result in misaligned expectations or unenforceable provisions. Investors should also be cautious about inadvertently creating binding obligations on financing commitments or valuations before due diligence is completed.

Due Diligence: Identifying Hidden Liabilities

Comprehensive due diligence is critical in the Saudi market, where regulatory compliance and governance structures vary significantly across industries. Key risk areas include:

  • Licensing and Regulatory Compliance: Foreign investment restrictions, validity of MISA licences, and sector-specific approvals (e.g. in banking, insurance, or telecoms).
  • Corporate Governance: Accuracy of shareholder registers, board structures, and compliance with the Companies Law.
  • Employment Matters: Saudisation obligations, end-of-service benefits, and ongoing labour disputes.
  • Tax Exposures: Outstanding zakat, tax liabilities, and transfer pricing compliance.
  • Contractual Risks: Change-of-control clauses, termination triggers, and enforceability of key agreements.

Failure to identify such risks early can lead to inflated valuations, disputes, or regulatory penalties that undermine deal viability.

Investment Structuring: Balancing Control and Compliance

Once risks are identified, structuring the investment is central to mitigating exposure and aligning investor interests with those of the founders or existing shareholders. Common approaches include minority equity stakes, joint ventures, or complete acquisitions.

Private equity investors in Saudi Arabia often seek protective rights such as reserved matters, board representation, and veto powers. However, these must be carefully balanced to avoid contravening restrictions on foreign ownership control or inadvertently triggering regulatory reclassification of the entity.

Moreover, financing structures involving shareholder loans, convertible instruments, or profit participation arrangements must be assessed for compliance with the Saudi Companies Law and tax framework. Improperly structured financing could give rise to recharacterisation risks or adverse withholding tax implications.

Shareholders’ Agreements: Allocating Rights and Responsibilities

The shareholders’ agreement (SHA) is a cornerstone of private equity deals, defining governance, management, and exit mechanics. Key areas of legal risk include:

  • Transfer Restrictions: Right of first refusal, tag-along, and drag-along rights must be enforceable under Saudi law and aligned with regulatory approvals.
  • Dividend Policies: Profit distribution arrangements must comply with the Companies Law and should account for zakat and tax considerations.
  • Deadlock Mechanisms: Buy-sell provisions, arbitration, or put/call options must be drafted to avoid prolonged disputes.
  • Protective Rights: Reserved matters should be precise and enforceable, avoiding overly broad veto rights that could stifle operations.

A poorly drafted SHA can create prolonged disputes or undermine investor protections, particularly in scenarios involving minority ownership.

Regulatory Approvals and Competition Clearance

Saudi Arabia’s competition regime has become increasingly sophisticated, requiring notification to the General Authority for Competition (GAC) for economic concentrations that meet specific thresholds. Transactions undertaken without clearance risk administrative fines, invalidation, or unwinding.

In addition, cross-border PE transactions may require scrutiny by sector regulators such as the Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) or the Communications, Space & Technology Commission (CST). Timely engagement with regulators is critical to avoiding closing delays.

Exit Strategies: Planning Ahead

An exit strategy should be considered from the outset of the investment. In Saudi Arabia, private equity exits typically occur through:

  • Trade Sales: Transfers to strategic buyers, often requiring fresh regulatory approvals.
  • Secondary Buyouts: Sales to another private equity fund, involving negotiation over warranties, indemnities, and valuation mechanisms.
  • Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): Increasingly viable with the growth of the Saudi capital markets, particularly Tadawul’s Main Market and Nomu (parallel market).

Each exit route carries distinct legal risks. For instance, IPOs are subject to rigorous disclosure obligations and approval from the Capital Market Authority (CMA). Trade sales may encounter competition scrutiny or change-of-control restrictions, while secondary buyouts often involve complex indemnity negotiations over legacy liabilities.

Dispute Resolution and Enforcement

Disputes in private equity deals often arise over valuation adjustments, earn-outs, or breaches of warranties. Arbitration is commonly chosen as the dispute resolution mechanism, with Saudi Arabia being a signatory to the New York Convention and having modernised its arbitration framework. The Saudi Centre for Commercial Arbitration (SCCA) offers a credible local platform, although enforcement remains subject to Sharia principles and oversight by local courts.

Private equity transactions in Saudi Arabia present investors with attractive opportunities, but they also carry legal risks across every stage of the deal lifecycle. From negotiating binding provisions in a term sheet to navigating regulatory approvals, drafting enforceable shareholders’ agreements, and structuring a viable exit, success depends on anticipating risks and embedding safeguards at the earliest stage. With the Kingdom’s regulatory framework becoming increasingly sophisticated, proactive risk management and careful structuring are essential for international and domestic private equity investors alike.

Understanding SSAC’s Arbitration Procedures for Club-Financier Conflicts

The Saudi Sports Arbitration Center (SSAC) serves as the Kingdom’s primary institution for resolving sports-related disputes, including conflicts between football clubs and their financiers. Established to ensure fairness, transparency, and efficiency in sports governance, the SSAC operates under a statutory framework that reflects international best practices while adhering to Saudi law.

 

Jurisdiction and Scope

The SSAC’s jurisdiction covers a wide range of sports disputes, including financial conflicts arising between clubs and financiers. Such disputes may involve sponsorship agreements, funding arrangements, loan obligations, or other financial undertakings. Arbitration under the SSAC is typically initiated through contractual arbitration clauses or by appeal against decisions of sports governing bodies, such as the Saudi Arabian Football Federation (SAFF) or the Saudi Professional League (SPL). The Centre ensures that disputes are resolved in accordance with both contractual agreements and the principles of equity and good governance.

Arbitration Procedures

The SSAC provides structured procedures to resolve disputes efficiently:

  1. Ordinary Arbitration – This procedure applies where parties have agreed to refer their dispute to the SSAC. It is suitable for contractual conflicts and allows parties to present claims and evidence, including financial reports and expert testimony, before an independent panel of arbitrators with specialised expertise in sports finance and governance.
  2. Appeal Arbitration – Applicable when disputing parties challenge decisions of sports governing bodies. Appeals must be filed within 21 days of notification of the original decision unless a shorter period is stipulated. The Chamber of Arbitration of Football Disputes typically handles appeals against SAFF decisions, ensuring that internal remedies are exhausted before arbitration.
Specialised Chambers for Financial Disputes

Recognising the complexity of financial conflicts in professional sports, the SSAC has established specialised chambers, including one focused on financial supervision matters. This chamber handles disputes related to the Financial Supervision Committee of the SPL, providing a structured forum for expert adjudication in cases involving financial oversight, compliance breaches, or funding irregularities.

Mediation Services

Beyond arbitration, the SSAC also offers mediation as a confidential and flexible means to resolve disputes amicably. Mediation allows parties to reach mutually acceptable agreements under the guidance of trained mediators, preserving professional relationships while avoiding lengthy formal proceedings.

Enforcement and Finality of Awards

Arbitral awards issued by the SSAC are final and binding, with limited grounds for challenge. This finality provides certainty and legal enforceability, ensuring that parties can rely on the resolution to protect financial stability and operational continuity within professional sports organisations.

The SSAC’s arbitration procedures for club-financier conflicts provide a comprehensive framework for resolving financial disputes within Saudi Arabia’s sports sector. Through a combination of expert arbitration, specialised chambers, and mediation, the Centre promotes financial accountability, market stability, and adherence to governance standards. For clubs, financiers, and other stakeholders, understanding these procedures is essential to managing disputes effectively and maintaining confidence in the Saudi sports ecosystem.

SAMA Soft Launches Rulebook and Expands Licensing Guidance

The Saudi Central Bank (SAMA) has updated its website to include the soft launch of its Rulebook, together with a newly added Licensing Guidelines section.

 

This is a significant development for financial institutions and applicants operating in the Kingdom, as it provides greater clarity on regulatory expectations and licensing procedures.

The Key Highlights Include:
  • Rulebook Access: The Rulebook consolidates regulatory requirements into an accessible platform, offering a central reference point for firms engaging with SAMA.
  • Licensing Guidelines Tab: This section details the licensing requirements under applicable laws and regulations, supported by practical checklists for specific license categories.
  • Checklists and Process Mapping: The checklists specify:
    o Required submissions (documents and forms).
    o Relevant departments and authorities to which submissions must be made.
    o Guidance that extends beyond minimum statutory obligations, helping applicants avoid delays caused by incomplete or misaligned filings.

The enhanced guidance reduces ambiguity in dealing with licensing procedures, particularly relevant for banks, fintechs, payment service providers, finance companies, and insurance operators seeking approvals.

By setting expectations that exceed the baseline legal requirements, SAMA is aligning with global regulatory best practice while also promoting smoother applicant interaction with the regulator.

This development is expected to support the Kingdom’s broader goals of transparency, efficiency, and growth in the financial services sector.

To access the Rulebook and Licensing Guidelines, visit: SAMA Rulebook.

For further guidance or to discuss the implications of the rulebook, contact Ghazal Tarabzouni.

MEYSAN AND HAMMAD & AL-MEHDAR ANNOUNCE STRATEGIC ALLIANCE TO STRENGTHEN LEGAL SERVICES ACROSS THE MIDDLE EAST.

Meysan, a renowned law firm known for its expertise in high-stakes litigation, corporate transactions, and advisory services, has joined forces with Hammad & Al-Mehdar Lawyers and Legal Consultants, a leading law firm with offices in Jeddah, Riyadh, Khobar, and Abu Dhabi.

This alliance combines the expertise and knowledge of both firms, enabling them to better serve the legal needs of international and regional clients operating across the Middle East. This alliance creates a regional powerhouse with deep expertise across jurisdictions and key sectors.
Having established a Riyadh office in 2021, Meysan announced that this strategic alliance will enhance the offerings and capabilities of both firms in corporate transactions and litigation matters in Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The firms also plan to integrate their respective corporate service offerings—Peregrine Corporate Services and Idarah Corporate Services—to further support their clients.

Building a Leading Regional Legal Alliance
This strategic alliance positions Meysan and Hammad & Al-Mehdar to meet the growing demand for legal services in the Middle East, as the region undergoes significant economic growth and regulatory developments. With a highly skilled team of lawyers, the alliance will provide extensive resources to serve a wide range of industries, including construction, technology, financial services, real estate, and others.

The alliance will bring together more than 70 lawyers across nine offices. This combined expertise and footprint will enable Meysan and Hammad & Al-Mehdar to address cross-border disputes, complex corporate transactions, and regulatory challenges for local, regional, and international clients.

Leadership Statements
Bader El-Jeaan, Managing Partner at Meysan, stated, “Our decision to partner with Hammad & Al-Mehdar, one of the most established players in Saudi Arabia, is in direct response to what our clients have told us they need. This alliance simplifies the legal process for our clients by providing them with a single point of contact for all their legal matters, whether governed by local or international law. It allows us to deepen our bench of litigation and corporate talent in Saudi Arabia.”

Knowing that they can directly access Saudi law advice through Meysan not only in respect of corporate transactional and litigation matters, which we already do, but in many more areas, gives our clients the added reassurance that we have responded to their requirements and that they will continue to benefit from the very highest levels of legal excellence and client care,” El-Jeaan added.

Dr. Adli Hammad, Co-Founder of Hammad & Al-Mehdar, commented, “Our strategic alliance with Meysan allows us to enhance our offerings and address the evolving needs of our clients within a rapidly changing legal landscape. We are excited to work closely with Meysan’s team, sharing our insights and strengths to build a leading regional alliance.”

“Being allied with a large peer firm allows us to provide our clients with an international product offering through a firm that shares our culture and vision. Meysan’s presence in Beirut, Cairo, Dubai, Kuwait, and London allows us to expand our service offerings for our clients beyond Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The alliance also allows us to cross-share talent and resources to serve our clients better,” Dr. Hammad added.

Next Steps and Future Plans
Meysan and Hammad & Al-Mehdar are already aligning operational processes to enhance client engagement across their joint footprint. As part of the alliance’s growth strategy, the firms intend to invest in technology and infrastructure to streamline services and ensure a seamless client experience across jurisdictions. Both firms will maintain their respective brands while adhering to unified service standards to provide clients with consistent, high-quality service. The alliance may explore deeper collaboration, including a potential merger at an appropriate juncture, to further solidify their shared goals and expand capabilities.

For more information, please contact
Meysan at:Media@meysan.com
Hammad & Al-Mehdar Lawyers and Legal Consultants at: MCBD@hmco.com.sa

Embracing Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) Platforms in Saudi Arabia

In recent years, Saudi Arabia has witnessed a dynamic shift towards embracing technology in various sectors, including law and justice. One of the notable developments in this landscape is the emergence of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms, heralding a new era of efficiency and accessibility in resolving disputes. This article delves into the transformative potential of ODR, its benefits, and the necessary framework for its widespread adoption in the Kingdom.

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms represent a cutting-edge approach to resolving disputes in the digital age. As the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia continues its journey towards a digital economy, integrating ODR platforms is timely and impactful. ODR leverages technology to facilitate efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution, catering to the evolving needs of a digitally connected society.

Benefits of ODR in Saudi Arabia

Adopting ODR brings many benefits, particularly in e-commerce and digital transactions. Accessibility stands out as a critical advantage, allowing parties involved in disputes to engage in the resolution process from anywhere with an internet connection. This accessibility is particularly advantageous in a vast country like Saudi Arabia, enabling citizens and businesses in remote areas to access justice without geographic constraints.

Moreover, ODR enhances affordability by significantly reducing the costs associated with traditional legal proceedings. The streamlined nature of online processes minimises the need for physical infrastructure and personnel, translating into more cost-effective dispute-resolution mechanisms. This affordability is transformative for small businesses and individual consumers, fostering a more equitable legal landscape.

Additionally, ODR platforms offer unmatched convenience. Parties can engage in dispute resolution at their convenience without the constraints of traditional court schedules. This flexibility is precious in the fast-paced realm of e-commerce, where swift resolutions are crucial to maintaining consumer trust and business continuity.

Regulatory Framework and Technological Infrastructure

A robust regulatory framework and technological infrastructure are imperative to fully harness ODR’s potential. Saudi Arabia has made notable strides in this regard, with recent legislative developments reflecting a proactive approach to digital transformation. Clear guidelines and regulations are essential to ensure online dispute resolution’s integrity, security, and enforceability.

Furthermore, investments in technological infrastructure are crucial to support the seamless operation of ODR platforms. This includes ensuring reliable internet connectivity, data security protocols, and user-friendly interfaces that cater to diverse users across the Kingdom.

We delve deeper into some additional details and considerations regarding the adoption of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms in Saudi Arabia:

  1. Addressing Cross-Border Disputes

With the increasing globalisation of commerce, cross-border transactions have become commonplace. ODR platforms can be pivotal in resolving disputes arising from international e-commerce activities involving Saudi businesses. By facilitating efficient cross-border dispute resolution, ODR enhances the Kingdom’s regional and global trade hub attractiveness.

  1. Integration with Sharia Law

Given Saudi Arabia’s legal framework, which is rooted in Sharia law, integrating ODR platforms requires careful consideration of religious and cultural sensitivities. ODR processes can be tailored to align with Sharia principles, ensuring compatibility with local norms and values while promoting a modern approach to dispute resolution.

  1. Building Trust and Confidence

The successful adoption of ODR hinges on building trust and confidence among users. This requires proactive measures to ensure transparency, data security, and procedural fairness within the digital dispute resolution ecosystem. Establishing accreditation mechanisms for ODR providers and promoting awareness campaigns can bolster public trust in these platforms.

  1. Capacity Building and Awareness

Enhancing the adoption of ODR platforms necessitates comprehensive capacity-building initiatives. This includes training legal professionals, judges, and stakeholders on ODR processes and technologies. Additionally, raising awareness among businesses and consumers about the benefits and functionalities of ODR is essential to drive widespread adoption and utilisation.

  1. Technological Innovations

The evolution of ODR platforms is closely intertwined with technological innovations such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and secure online authentication systems. Leveraging these technologies can enhance the efficiency and credibility of ODR processes, enabling faster case resolution and reducing administrative burdens.

  1. Collaborative Partnerships

The successful implementation of ODR requires collaborative partnerships between government entities, legal institutions, technology providers, and industry stakeholders. By fostering a collaborative ecosystem, Saudi Arabia can leverage collective expertise to address regulatory challenges, enhance infrastructure, and drive continuous innovation in ODR.

  1. Pilot Projects and Evaluations

Conducting pilot projects and evaluations of ODR platforms in specific sectors or regions can provide valuable insights into their effectiveness and scalability. Policymakers can fine-tune regulations and refine ODR frameworks to better serve diverse stakeholders’ needs by monitoring outcomes and soliciting participant feedback.

Looking Ahead

As Saudi Arabia paves the way for a digital future, integrating Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms emerges as a progressive step towards enhancing access to justice and fostering a conducive business environment. The benefits of ODR, from accessibility and affordability to convenience, resonate strongly in a society increasingly reliant on digital transactions.

The embrace of ODR in Saudi Arabia signifies a paradigm shift towards modern, efficient, and inclusive dispute resolution mechanisms. By nurturing a supportive regulatory framework and advancing technological capabilities, the Kingdom is poised to unlock ODR’s transformative potential, ensuring equitable access to justice and reinforcing its position as a leader in digital innovation.

Analysing Legal Risks in Digital Asset Custody and Storage in Saudi Arabia

The burgeoning landscape of digital assets, from cryptocurrencies to tokenised securities, presents a dynamic frontier in financial technology. In Saudi Arabia, as in many jurisdictions globally, the custody and storage of digital assets raise intricate legal challenges. This article delves into the nuanced legal risks associated with digital asset custody and storage solutions within the Kingdom, focusing on security breaches, asset recovery, regulatory compliance, and best practices for risk mitigation.

Due to the inherent value of the assets they hold, digital asset custody platforms are prime targets for cyberattacks. Given the evolving nature of cyber threats, the risk of security breaches poses significant concerns in Saudi Arabia. Breaches can result in theft or loss of assets, potentially leading to financial liabilities for custodians. Moreover, breaches may expose custodians to immediate legal actions from affected users or regulatory authorities.

The recoverability of digital assets in the event of loss or theft presents a unique challenge. Unlike traditional financial assets, many digital assets’ decentralised and pseudonymous nature complicates recovery efforts. Custodians face legal uncertainties around the recourse available to asset owners in such scenarios, including potential disputes over liability and responsibility.

Navigating the regulatory landscape is critical for digital asset custodians in Saudi Arabia. The Kingdom’s regulatory framework for digital assets is continuously evolving, focusing on consumer protection, anti-money laundering (AML), and combating terrorist financing (CTF). Custodians must adhere to stringent compliance requirements, including licensing, reporting, and maintaining robust AML/CFT measures. Non-compliance can lead to severe penalties and legal repercussions.

To mitigate these risks, custodians should implement multi-layered security protocols, including encryption, cold storage solutions, and continuous monitoring of suspicious activities. Regular security audits and penetration testing can help identify vulnerabilities and strengthen defences against cyber threats. Establishing comprehensive legal agreements with clients is also essential. Contracts should outline the rights, responsibilities, and liabilities of custodians and asset owners in various scenarios, including breach incidents and asset recovery processes.

Staying abreast of evolving regulations and engaging with regulatory authorities is crucial. Custodians should proactively adapt compliance measures to align with Saudi Arabia’s regulatory expectations, ensuring transparency and accountability. Additionally, obtaining appropriate insurance coverage against cyber risks and asset loss can provide custodians with financial protection and bolster client confidence in the security of their assets.

Digital asset custodians operating in Saudi Arabia must navigate cross-border regulatory challenges. These include compliance with foreign laws governing cross-border transactions, tax implications of international transfers, and adherence to global AML/CFT standards. Custodians also face legal risks related to jurisdictional differences, regulatory alignment, and international enforcement actions. Regulatory oversight and enforcement actions pose legal risks for custodians. Saudi Arabia’s regulatory authorities may conduct audits, investigations, or inspections to ensure compliance with digital asset regulations. Custodians must demonstrate adherence to licensing requirements, operational standards, and reporting obligations to mitigate legal exposure to regulatory sanctions or penalties.

Digital asset custody agreements may involve parties from different jurisdictions, raising legal complexities in dispute resolution and legal jurisdiction. Custodians must define applicable laws, jurisdictional forums, and dispute resolution mechanisms in custody contracts. Legal risks include challenges in enforcing judgments across borders and resolving international disputes. The evolving nature of digital assets presents novel legal issues for custodians. These include legal considerations related to tokenisation, decentralised finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and the regulatory implications of emerging technologies. Custodians face legal uncertainties surrounding the legal status of digital assets, smart contracts, and governance frameworks.

Embracing legal technology solutions can enhance operational efficiency and risk management for custodians. Implementing blockchain-based legal contracts, innovative contract auditing tools, and digital identity verification platforms can streamline compliance processes, reduce legal risks, and improve transparency in digital asset custody operations.

Custodians can leverage regulatory sandbox programs offered by Saudi Arabian authorities to pilot innovative digital asset custody solutions in a controlled environment. Participation in regulatory sandboxes enables custodians to test compliance measures, validate operational models, and collaborate with regulators to address legal uncertainties. Investing in ongoing legal education and training is essential for custodians and compliance teams. Custodians should stay abreast of legal developments, attend regulatory workshops, and pursue professional certifications in fintech law and digital asset regulation. Well-informed personnel are better equipped to navigate legal risks and compliance challenges effectively.

The custody and storage of digital assets in Saudi Arabia demand a proactive approach to managing legal risks. Custodians must navigate the complex interplay between technological innovation and regulatory oversight to foster trust and safeguard assets. By implementing robust security measures, establishing clear legal frameworks, adhering to regulatory requirements, and leveraging insurance solutions, custodians can mitigate legal risks and foster a secure environment for the custody of digital assets in Saudi Arabia.

Addressing Legal Challenges in Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in Saudi Arabia

In today’s digitally driven landscape, Saudi Arabia, like many nations, grapples with significant legal challenges in cybersecurity and data privacy. As the Kingdom advances in its digital transformation journey, policymakers and businesses increasingly focus on establishing robust legal frameworks to safeguard sensitive information, combat cyber threats, and foster trust in the digital ecosystem. This article explores the legal hurdles associated with cybersecurity and data privacy in Saudi Arabia, covering regulatory mandates, incident response protocols, liability frameworks for data breaches, and innovative legal solutions.

Regulatory Mandates Concerning Data Protection

Saudi Arabia has taken significant strides towards enhancing data protection regulations. The Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL), enacted in 2019, marked a pivotal moment in the Kingdom’s approach to data privacy. The PDPL sets comprehensive guidelines for collecting, processing, storing, and transferring personal data. It mandates data controllers and processors to implement stringent security measures to protect personal information against unauthorised access or disclosure.

The Saudi Communication and Information Technology Commission (CITC) is also crucial in overseeing data protection and privacy compliance. The CITC regularly updates guidelines and standards to align with global best practices, fostering a more secure and transparent digital environment.

Protocols for Incident Response

Despite preventive measures, cyber incidents remain a pressing concern. To address this, Saudi Arabia emphasises the importance of incident response protocols. Organisations must report data breaches to regulatory authorities promptly and affected individuals, ensuring swift containment and mitigation of cyber threats. The PDPL mandates organisations to establish incident response teams and procedures to handle data breaches effectively while minimising adverse impacts on individuals’ privacy.

Liability Frameworks for Data Breaches

Establishing liability frameworks is essential for holding parties accountable for data breaches. The PDPL outlines penalties for non-compliance, including fines and potential criminal sanctions for severe violations. Organisations are responsible for implementing adequate cybersecurity measures and promptly notifying affected individuals and authorities of breaches. Additionally, the law encourages cooperation between public and private sectors to strengthen cybersecurity resilience across the Kingdom.

Exploration of Innovative Legal Solutions

Saudi Arabia is exploring innovative legal solutions to mitigate cybersecurity risks in an increasingly interconnected world. This includes fostering public-private partnerships to share threat intelligence, investing in cybersecurity education and training programs, and incentivising businesses to adopt emerging technologies like blockchain and AI for enhanced data protection.

Furthermore, the Saudi government encourages the development of cybersecurity startups and research initiatives to drive innovation in the field. Collaborative efforts between academia, industry, and policymakers are vital for developing cutting-edge legal frameworks that anticipate and address emerging cybersecurity challenges.

Regulatory Sandboxes for Innovation

Saudi Arabia has established regulatory sandboxes to encourage cybersecurity technology and solutions innovation. These sandboxes provide a controlled environment where startups and technology companies can test new cybersecurity products and services under regulatory supervision. This initiative fosters collaboration between innovators and regulators, enabling the development of cutting-edge solutions while ensuring compliance with data protection laws.

Investment in Emerging Technologies

Saudi Arabia invests in emerging technologies such as quantum computing and secure multiparty computation to enhance data privacy and encryption capabilities. These technologies have the potential to revolutionise cybersecurity by enabling secure data sharing and processing while protecting privacy rights. By embracing technological innovation, Saudi Arabia seeks to stay ahead of evolving cyber threats and bolster its national cybersecurity posture.

“Saudi Arabia proactively addresses cybersecurity and data privacy legal challenges through robust regulatory mandates, incident response protocols, liability frameworks, and innovative legal solutions. As the Kingdom accelerates its digital transformation, ensuring a secure, privacy-respecting digital environment remains a top priority. Saudi Arabia aims to bolster cybersecurity resilience and build trust in its evolving digital economy by continuously refining legal frameworks and fostering collaboration”.

Suhaib Hammad, Partner