Category Archives: Artificial Intelligence

AI Laws & Regulatory Frameworks in the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia

Posted on by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has leapt from an emerging technology to a strategic pillar of economic, social, and governmental transformation across the Gulf. Both the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) have integrated AI into their national visions, targeting sustainable growth, digital leadership, and global competitiveness. Governing AI is not just about vision; it is about legal frameworks that balance innovation with ethics, security, and individual rights.

 

In this context, the regulatory landscapes in the UAE and KSA are evolving rapidly, blending legal structures, ethical principles, sector-specific guidance, and forward-looking frameworks that prepare the region for the next generation of digital transformation.

The UAE: A Multi-Layered Regulatory Ecosystem

In the UAE, AI governance is not yet encapsulated in one single AI statute but is governed through a combination of data protection laws, ethical principles, guidelines, and strategic national policies.

Strategic Foundations

The UAE was one of the first countries globally to institutionalise AI at the federal level. In 2017, it appointed a Minister of State for Artificial Intelligence and introduced the National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence 2031, which places AI at the heart of economic competitiveness and public service delivery.

Legal and Compliance Landscape

While there is no stand-alone AI law covering all AI systems, AI is regulated through existing legal frameworks, especially those related to personal data and privacy. The Federal Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL): Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 governs how personal data, often used in AI training and processing, must be collected, processed, and stored. It includes consent requirements and safeguards aligned with international norms. Free Zone Data Regulations in financial free zones such as the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) and Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) apply bespoke data regimes, some of which include AI-specific components.

Ethics and Principles

Overlaying the legal structures are ethical AI principles that emphasise transparency, fairness, explainability, accountability, privacy, and alignment with human values. The UAE’s AI Principles and Ethics framework articulates these core standards, reinforcing trust and safety in AI deployment across sectors.

Sector-Specific Guidance

Regulators in healthcare, finance, and transportation are increasingly issuing targeted guidance to ensure AI in sensitive contexts adheres to both general law and industry standards.

Saudi Arabia: Strategic Growth with Emerging Regulation

Saudi Arabia’s approach to AI law is similarly progressive but distinctive in its structure. With AI designated a strategic priority under Vision 2030, the Kingdom is building an ecosystem that promotes innovation while embedding ethical and governance guardrails.

Central Governance: SDAIA

The Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA) serve as the national reference body for data and AI strategy. Established by royal decree in 2019, SDAIA coordinates AI policy, data governance, and ethical guidelines across government and industry.

Legal Backdrop and Ethics

Currently, AI activities in Saudi Arabia are regulated through a combination of related laws and influential non-binding frameworks. The Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) became effective in 2023 and sets rules for data controllers, processing conditions, breach notification timelines, and fines. SDAIA has issued AI ethics guidelines emphasising fairness, transparency, accountability, and human oversight. Specific guidance on emerging technologies, such as large language models, clarifies content authenticity and governance expectations.

Draft and Forthcoming AI Law

Saudi Arabia is developing a dedicated AI regulatory framework to support its position as a global AI innovation hub, foster investment in advanced digital technologies, enable scalable sovereign data infrastructure, and potentially introduce jurisdictional models for foreign AI services within defined legal structures. This anticipated law signals the Kingdom’s intention to create a more holistic AI-specific legal framework that complements broader economic and digital goals.

Comparatives
Aspect UAE Saudi Arabia
AI Law in Force No single comprehensive AI law; regulated via PDPL, ethical principles, sector rules No current standalone AI law: PDPL and ethics guidelines apply; draft AI law in development
Data Protection Federal PDPL plus Free Zone regulations PDPL 2023 with strict local requirements
Ethics and Governance National ethical principles and strategic framework SDAIA ethics principles and adoption guidance
Innovation Focus Early adopter with strategic integration across sectors Strategic emphasis on AI hub status and robust regulations
Key Themes in AI Regulation

 

Innovation with Responsibility

Regulators emphasise the importance of maintaining technological advancement while embedding ethical safeguards against bias, opacity, and misuse.

Data Privacy as Regulatory Foundation

Because AI depends heavily on data, personal data protection regimes like PDPL are the legal cornerstone of AI governance in both the UAE and Saudi Arabia.

Sector-Driven Oversight

Healthcare, finance, and critical infrastructure have tailored guidance reflecting risk and public interest.

Toward Unified AI Laws

Both nations are moving toward more formal AI regulatory frameworks, signalling that current structures are transitional stages in a rapidly evolving legal environment.

Implications for Businesses and Practitioners

Organisations deploying or developing AI solutions in the UAE or Saudi Arabia must ensure PDPL compliance for any personal data processing, adopt ethical AI practices aligned with national principle frameworks, monitor regulatory developments, including Saudi Arabia’s forthcoming AI law, and implement governance, risk, and compliance frameworks that embed AI lifecycle oversight and accountability.

The UAE and Saudi Arabia are shaping AI governance with strategic, layered frameworks that encourage innovation, protect individual rights, and foster ethical AI ecosystems. While neither country has yet enacted a comprehensive, standalone AI law, the combination of data protection legislation, ethical principles, draft laws, and sector guidance offers a robust, rapidly maturing regulatory environment. Staying informed and proactive in compliance is a key differentiator for businesses operating across the Gulf.

In summary:

The Riyadh Charter for Artificial Intelligence: Legal Implications for Saudi Arabia

Posted on by

The Riyadh Charter for Artificial Intelligence is more than a symbolic statement of intent. It reflects a decisive shift in how Saudi Arabia intends to govern emerging technologies, not through caution, but through clarity. The Kingdom has recognised that AI will sit at the centre of its digital economy, public services, industrial transformation, and investment landscape. With that recognition comes a simple truth: no jurisdiction can scale AI without establishing who is responsible, what standards apply, and how risks will be managed. The Charter is the start of that legal architecture.

 

In practice, the Charter signals that Saudi Arabia is preparing to regulate AI in the same way it regulates financial services, healthcare, data, and critical infrastructure through structured controls, defined accountability, and enforceable expectations. Rather than waiting for global frameworks to mature, the Kingdom is positioning itself as a rule-setter. This means organisations operating here should prepare for a future in which AI systems cannot simply be deployed because they are innovative; they will need to be justified, monitored, and explainable.

This matters because AI is already influencing decisions that affect people’s rights, access, and opportunities. Credit scoring, hiring tools, predictive analytics, automated compliance checks, content moderation, and medical decision-support systems are not theoretical issues; they are real technologies already in use. The Charter anticipates this reality and places responsibility firmly back on humans. It expects organisations to know how their systems work, understand the data used to train them, monitor for bias in outcomes, and retain the ability to intervene.

The Charter also reinforces one of Saudi Arabia’s strongest legal themes data sovereignty. With the Personal Data Protection Law now fully enforced, the Charter supports a future in which AI models trained on Saudi data must comply with Saudi rules. That includes lawful processing, transparency, minimisation, cybersecurity, and restrictions on international data transfers. Many global AI models cannot meet these standards today, meaning companies will need to revisit how datasets are sourced, how cloud infrastructure is structured, and how transparency obligations to regulators and individuals are met. AI built on ambiguous, scraped, or non-compliant data will struggle to find a home under Saudi law.

Commercially, this triggers a second shift: AI contracts will need to evolve. The traditional software-as-a-service template is no longer adequate. Organisations will need clarity on model governance, training data provenance, audit rights, IP ownership, liability limits, and accuracy thresholds. Vendors will be expected to disclose more. Deployers will have to validate more. Boards will need to review more. The Charter implicitly raises the standard of care expected of everyone in the AI supply chain, from developers and integrators to operators and end users.

There is also a strategic dimension. By shaping its own AI governance narrative, Saudi Arabia is sending a signal to investors, foreign companies, and regulators: the Kingdom is not simply adopting AI; it is shaping the environment in which AI can safely and confidently scale. This is essential for sectors such as finance, healthcare, energy, aviation, and smart city development, where the risks of opaque or untested algorithms are high. A clear framework reduces uncertainty and provides confidence to international partners seeking stability in emerging markets.

The Riyadh Charter is laying the foundations for the Kingdom’s future AI law. While the Charter itself is not yet legislation, its principles of accountability, transparency, fairness, human-centric design, and responsible use foreshadow the standards that regulators will enforce. Organisations that begin preparing now will be better positioned to comply and will face fewer operational disruptions as formal regulations are introduced.

For businesses, the direction of travel is unmistakable. AI cannot be an uncontrolled layer added to existing systems. It must be governed with the same seriousness as financial reporting, cybersecurity, and data protection. Senior leaders will soon be expected to demonstrate that their AI systems are safe, explainable, and legally grounded. Those who move early will not only reduce risk but also gain a competitive advantage as AI adoption accelerates across the Kingdom.

The Riyadh Charter ultimately tells a story of ambition aligned with responsibility. It positions Saudi Arabia as a global voice in shaping AI governance. It offers organisations a clear signal: innovation will be supported, but only within a framework that protects people, ensures accountability, and strengthens trust.